Practice Makes Perfect.


"Nothing is fun until you are good at it."

A recent Wall Street Journal piece entitled "Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior" reports that it is the Chinese parent's unwavering belief in discipline, study, and practice that produces the "stereotypically successful" Chinese child.  Chinese parents expect accomplishment from their children and seemingly will go to any lengths to goad them into it. The article is fascinating. 

The author of the article, herself Chinese, writes that she has never let her two daughters do any of the following:

Article author Amy Chua with her daughters, Louisa and Sophia, at their home
in New Haven, Conn.
 • attend a sleepover

• have a playdate

• be in a school play

• complain about not being in a school play

• watch TV or play computer games

• choose their own extracurricular activities

• get any grade less than an A

• not be the No. 1 student in every subject except gym and drama

• play any instrument other than the piano or violin

• not play the piano or violin.

Sounds harsh, doesn't it?  No tv? Ever? Preposterous. Such an approach by Western parents would probably result in our children rebelling outright against us, filing for emancipation, or reporting us for abuse.  The article does not deal with the long-term effects that such draconian parenting has on the child. Can anyone possibly hold up under the pressure of trying to go through life undefeated—at being perfect? Does a child who makes an 88 on a test and feels himself/herself a failure have a realistic disposition?  


A recent study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), points out that Asian Americans are more likely to commit suicide than American whites, blacks and Hispanics. Why? Because of the intense pressure to perform. Article author Amy Chua writes that
What Chinese parents understand is that nothing is fun until you're good at it. To get good at anything you have to work, and children on their own never want to work, which is why it is crucial to override their preferences. This often requires fortitude on the part of the parents because the child will resist; things are always hardest at the beginning, which is where Western parents tend to give up. 

The goal is admirable,  the methodology debatable.

In this country and in most Western societies, we believe that if you push a child too hard, he/she will fold.  We believe that our children thrive in an atmosphere of positivity, that our children do better with the gentle embrace as opposed to the firm hand.  We believe that our children need to be coddled and propped up and allowed to do the silly things that kids do so that they can grow up to be successful adults.  Chua goes on to state that

Western parents try to respect their children's individuality, encouraging them to pursue their true passions, supporting their choices, and providing positive reinforcement and a nurturing environment. By contrast, the Chinese believe that the best way to protect their children is by preparing them for the future, letting them see what they're capable of, and arming them with skills, work habits and inner confidence that no one can ever take away. 

Nothing is fun until you are good at it.  In my experience that is an unassailable truth. In his book Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell hypothesizes that it takes 10,000 hours of applied effort in order to master any skill.  There are no shortcuts to excellence, he wrote.  In the absence of savantism, mastery comes only as the result of practice. While I enjoy the incremental progress that practice makes possible as I learn the guitar, I would much rather be proficient now and living out my rock star future now rather than at some point thousands of practice hours in the future. It won't ever happen unless I commit myself to the effort needed to improve. 

Who could possibly enjoy being terrible at something forever?  History is full of people famous for their ineptitude. William Hung, for example. He did become famous, not because he was good but because he was bad. Extraordinarily bad. Any admiration he garnered was not as a result of his talent but rather because of his seeming indifference to ridicule.  He was the court jester, not the king. There is a difference.

She bang! She bang!

My two sons play basketball.  I encourage them to practice but I do not demand it. I want them to love the game but I want them to love it on their own, not because I forced it on them.  If the interest is there, I assume that they will find within themselves the motivation to practice.  This contradicts the Chinese approach.  Children need to be told what to do because, given a choice, they will always opt for the easier path, say the Chinese. Were I Chinese, I would make them practice until they hated me but  became proficient.  Most Western parents would not think this a fair trade since we know that raising a child is hard enough without willfully antagonizing them.


 2007 Lexington School Father/Son basketball game.

Where I think the Chinese approach would typically fail in a Western home is in the demands that it places upon the parents. We can order our children to practice a skill for three hours a day, but will we supervise that practice?  In our over-scheduled lives, where time is our most precious commodity, such a parental commitment would seem extraordinary. Not so with the Chinese. Apparently.

Perhaps then my sons' basketball shortcomings are the result not of my own children's lack of commitment, but rather of mine. Whereas Chinese parents will put in whatever time is necessary, I am not willing to work with them until they show some initiative.  I want improvement to be their idea, not mine.  True motivation comes from within.   

In the things that we consider to be truly important, my wife and I are Chinese.  We do expect academic excellence, for instance. We are making sacrifices to give our children a solid educational foundation and we expect a return on our investment.  We have stressed to them that academic achievement will present to them opportunities that will not otherwise be possible. We monitor our children's schoolwork closely and commit to it the time needed to ensure that they maintain focus.  

Our overall approach then is a hybrid of the two methodologies. Having been children ourselves, we are not without empathy.  However, I believe that the "every child is a winner" approach to parenting does them a disservice.  Life is not fair and never has been.  We are granted not the right of happiness, only the pursuit of it.  Raising our children to believe that they are entitled to a reward just for being present sets them up for failure because everything in life is a competition.  Whether or not you want to compete,  the game goes on with or without you. 



Comments

  1. Everyone's an only child in China. Pretty easy to parent one or even two. To continue your basketball theme, with 3 or more, parents have to drop back into a zone and somebody's always open!

    ReplyDelete
  2. True Lee!

    I completely agree with you Seward (alert the media:-)......children should learn the thrill of victory AND the agony of defeat. It is what awaits them in life and helping them learn how to deal with disappointment is the best parenting we can offer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I dig the new look and graphics. As for the topic at hand... by full disclaimer I am not a parent... but I am a damn good uncle/3rd parent.

    This is such an interesting topic... I've read some of the annectodal media coverage and I'd be curious to know what part social class standing plays in both E/W cultures. Asian culture seems to promote speficicity, while Western culture seems to promote a more well-rounded approach.

    From my own experience... I'm very happy with a diverse training... although I often wonder about if I had focused on one area. My Woodberry experience prepared me in a wide range of areas... as I would imagine the Episcopal currliculum did to a lesser degree.

    But the cultural question is not in which direction should we excel, but to what degree? Is it best to further the playing of violins and piano in a classical style, or to develop new genres of music such as jazz and rock.

    I'm rambling and will try to tie this together later, but there are merits to both sides...whether you are the programmers who create "Call Of Duty" or the western kids who are using their creativity to kick ass.

    As always Seward... thanks for stirring the intellectual pot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a very interesting and timely topic. I share the belief and hope that their own passions will drive their motivation to mastery. On the other hand I believe there's merit to pushing them through a learning curve until they're good and it's fun. One question for you on that bball picture...are you missing a piece of black apparatus on your left leg? I can see part of your skin.

    ReplyDelete
  5. All of the evidence I have been reading in psychology research over the past couple of years in my schooling has suggested that the best parenting style is to strike a BALANCE between being nurturing and supportive, allowing children a certain degree of autonomy, and also setting boundaries and parameters for their behavior. Also research in the positive psychology field has shown that a component of happiness and well being comes from being able to express one's unique talents, passions, and skills in a way that is not too challenging, yet that pushes you to accomplish more and become better. Happiness does not come from having it easy, but instead from the Will and the Ability to accomplish Challenging things that inspire you. Ideally, the more that this can be done in conjunction and interaction with others, the better!

    Interesting that you brought this up Seward as my mother and I have been discussing this Chinese woman's articles too.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts